Court Cases Archives - Civil Service Rules

Resignation Cannot Be Rejected

Posted on September 27, 2018 by Civil Service Rules | 0 Comments

The Supreme Court of Pakistan has held that no service rule has empowered the employer to refuse to accept the resignation, thus, resignation cannot be rejected. Tendering resignation is the right of the employee and to accept it, unless resignation…

Resignation From Service to Join New Post Has No Effect On Previous Service

Posted on September 27, 2018 by Civil Service Rules | 0 Comments

Under Rule 2.11 of Punjab Civil Service Pension Rules, strengthened with Civil Service Regulation No.418, Resignation from a post to join another pensionable service has no effect on the previous service. The said point has also been held by the…

Retirement Notification is Not Necessary in Case of Superannuation

Posted on September 27, 2018 by Civil Service Rules | 0 Comments

The Supreme Court of Pakistan in a case has held that issuance of retirement notification is not necessary in case the government servant attains the age of superannuation. Where competent authority failed to notify the fact of retirement in gazette,…

INSTRUCTIONS FOR CONDUCTING DEPARTMENTAL INQUIRY IN CASES OF FRAUD AND EMBEZZLEMENT OF GOVERNMENT MONEY IN, WHICH GOVERNMENT SERVANTS ARE INVOLVED

Posted on September 6, 2018 by Civil Service Rules | 1 Comment

There is a tendency for the head of office or department to regard the institution of criminal proceedings as absolving him from the task of conducting an immediate and thorough departmental inquiry. Reluctance may be enhanced by the apprehension that…

No Jurisdiction Against Order/decision of Departmental Authority Determining the Fitness or Otherwise of a Person for Promotion to Higher Post or Grade

Posted on August 31, 2018 by Civil Service Rules | 0 Comments

[Supreme Court of Pakistan] Present: Nazim Hussain Siddiqui and Abdul Hameed Dogar, JJ SHAFT MUHAMMAD MUGHAL‑‑‑Appellant Versus SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION and others‑‑‑Respondents Constitutional Petition for Leave to Appeal No.39‑Q of 2000, decided on 17th July, 2000. (a) Service Tribunals Act…

Quantification Formula and Promotion

Posted on August 31, 2018 by Civil Service Rules | 0 Comments

[Lahore High Court] Before Muhammad Akhtar Shabbir, J MUHAMMAD ASHRAF Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Establishment, Government of Pakistan and another Writ Petition No.11 of 2007, heard on 19th March, 2007. (a) ESTACODE (1997 Edition)— —-Sl. No.172-A— Civil service— Promotion—…

To Promote Civil Servant From the Date of Availability of Post

Posted on August 8, 2018 by Civil Service Rules | 0 Comments

[Supreme Court of Pakistan] Present: Saad Saood Jan and Muhammad Ilyas, JJ GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Secretary Education and another ‑‑‑Petitioners versus Rana GHULAM SARWAR KHAN and 111 others‑‑‑Respondent Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.611‑L of 1995, decided…

Fresh Appointees Are Juniors To Those Who Are Promoted In Same Year By Departmental Promotion Committee

Posted on August 8, 2018 by Civil Service Rules | 0 Comments

[Supreme Court of Pakistan] Present: Mian Shakirullah Jan and Ch. Ijaz Ahmed, JJ DIRECTOR-GENERAL INTELLIGENCE BUREAU, ISLAMABAD and others Versus AMIR MUJAHID KHAN and others—Respondents Civil Appeals Nos. 710 to 719 of 2009, decided on 13th October, 2009. (On appeal…

Promotees Of The Same Year Shall Take Precedence In The Matter Of Seniority Over Those Joining On Initial Recruitment In The Same Year

Posted on August 8, 2018 by Civil Service Rules | 0 Comments

Present: Mohammad Haleem, C. J. , Shafiur Rahman, Javid lqbal, Ali Hussain Qazilbash and Usman Ali Shah, JJ FAZAL‑I‑QADIR and others‑‑Appellants versus SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT. DIVISION and others‑‑Respondents Civil Appeals Nos. 824 to 826 of 1984 and 399 of 1986, decided on…

Posts Reserved For Promotion To Be Filled In First Before Making Direct Recruitment For Posts

Posted on August 8, 2018 by Civil Service Rules | 0 Comments

[Federal Service Tribunal] Present: Syed Ally Madad Shah, Chairman and Muhammad Irshad Khan, Member Mian GHULAM QADIR and 2 others versus SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION, RAWALPINDI and 10 others Appeals Nos. 321‑R of 1985, 47‑R and 57‑R of 1986, decided on…